With the upcoming ETS and SBL annual meetings just round the corner, academic publishers are rushing to announce new releases of numerous academic books to capture the attention of the delegates of the two largest biblical conferences.
One highlight is the inauguration of the a brand new commentary series: Paideia: Commentaries on the New Testament, published by Baker Academic. The first volume in this series, Ephesians and Colossians by Charles H. Talbert, will soon be released in time for the conferences.
With the proliferation of commentaries, is there a justification for another new series? What then is the distinction of the Paideia series?
According to the editors of the series, Mikeal C. Parsons and Charles H. Talbert, Paideia aims itself to be "a series that sets out to comment on the final form of the New Testament text in a way that pays due attention both to the cultural, literary, and theological settings in which the text took form and also to the interests of the contemporary readers to whom the commentaries are addressed." (emphasis mine)
Who then is this series targeted at?
"This series is aimed squarely at students—including MA students in religious and theological studies programs, seminarians, and upper-divisional undergraduates—who have theological interests in the biblical text." (emphasis mine)
"Thus, the didactic aim of the series is to enable students to understand each book of the New Testament as a literary whole rooted in a particular ancient setting and related to its context within the New Testament."
How then would Paideia aim to achieve this? How would the commentaries in this series look like? What is the approach used?
According to the editors, "each commentary deals with the text in terms of larger rhetorical units; these are not verse-by-verse commentaries. This series thus stands within the stream of recent commentaries that attend to the final form of the text. Such reader-centered literary approaches are inherently more accessible to liberal arts students without extensive linguistic and historical-critical preparation than older exegetical approaches, but within the reader-centered world the sanest practitioners have paid careful attention to the extratext of the original readers, including not only these readers’ knowledge of the geography, history, and other context elements reflected in the text but also to their ability to respond correctly to the literary and rhetorical conventions used in the text. Paideia commentaries pay deliberate attention to this extratextual repertoire in order to highlight the ways in which the text is designed to persuade and move its readers." (emphasis mine)
"Each rhetorical unit is explored from three angles:
(1) introductory matters;
(2) tracing the train of thought or narrative flow of the argument; and
(3) theological issues raised by the text that are of interest to the contemporary Christian.
"Thus, the primary focus remains on the text and not its historical context or its interpretation in the secondary literature." (emphasis mine)
It is worthwhile to note that contributors to this series comprise scholars of international reputation. Apart from the first installment by Charles H. Talbert on Ephesians and Colossians, forthcoming volumes in the Paideia series include: James W. Thompson on Hebrews (Fall 2008), Mikeal C. Parsons on Acts (Fall 2008), Frank J. Matera on Romans, Pheme Perkins on First Corinthians, and Raymond F. Collins on Second Corinthians.
Thus far, this series appears to be interesting enough to capture my attention. I would be very interested to see as to how the above aims and objectives will be achieved in the first installment of this series, Ephesians and Colossians, that will be released soon. If successful, this series will be helpful not only for theological students but also for anyone who is interested in the final form and theological interests in the New Testament. It may also prove to be useful for lay teachers and preachers in the church. While this series is aimed at students, it is hope that seasoned scholars will also find this series engaging enough to be able to satisfy one's hunger for scholarly investigation of the biblical texts. Having said that, judging solely from the description of the series, it seems that those who are primarily interested in the historical-critical approaches to the biblical texts may have to look elsewhere.
I look forward to be a proud owner of the first volume in the Paideia series.
5 comments:
hi kar yong,
First, the series looks like it is written in response to what we had discussed earlier: whether a knowledge of ancient Greek and Hebrew is necessary for seminary students etc. Producing such a series implied a tacit allowance for a future generation of seminarians who are not familiar with the ancient languages.
Second, I am a bit confused by the promotion. On one hand, it seems to give emphasis to final form of the New Testament text in a way that pays due attention both to the cultural, literary, and theological settings in which the text took form and also to the interests of the contemporary readers to whom the commentaries are addressed but later the primary focus remains on the text and not its historical context or its interpretation in the secondary literature. I wish they will make up their mind.
Finally, I agree with you that judging solely from the description of the series, it seems that those who are primarily interested in the critical and historical approaches to the biblical texts may have to look elsewhere.. However, I shall reserve my comments until I have read Ephesians and Colossi ans by Charles H. Talbert,
Hi, thanks for noticing the first volume of the Paideia series. We are excited about the series and the excellent lineup of authors! Just to clarify the promotion that seems to be confusing. The interest is "historical," insofar as authors pay close attention to the rhetorical conventions, social customs, and theological issues that situate the NT writing in its ancient context. BUT the series does not intend to be "historical-critical" in the traditional sense of examining form-critical or source-critical issues, typically associated with historical-critical approaches. Focus on the theological message of the text leads naturally to a discussion of its contemporary relevance (third "angle"). I hope this helps and that you find the series, and especially this first installment by my colleague Charles Talbert, helpful.
Mikeal Parsons
Professor Baylor University
Co-Editor, Paideia Commentary Series
P.S. The commentaries provide fresh translations of the Greek text and do comment on greek terms (in transliteration). So some knowledge of Greek on the user's part will enhance the benefits of the commentary, but it is not, strictly speaking, an absolute requiste.
all the best,
mp
Hi Mikeal,
Thanks for dropping by, and also for clarifying the confusion about the promotion as highlighted by Alex.
I have high regards for Charles, and have intereacted with his works in my own research and dissertation. I have no doubt that I will find his latest commentary on Ephesians and Colossians helpful and insightful, particularly in his "discussion of its contemporary relevance." I am looking forward not only to this volume but also to future volumes, especially on the Corinthians correspondence, an area of my interest.
Wishing all the best for the Paideia series.
Hi Alex,
Thanks for your comments.
I think the Paideia series fills a vacuum in the market, and those without the biblical language background might find this useful. Another series along the lines of Paideia is the NIVAC series. But it seems to me that apart from what both Mikeal and I highlighted, another significant difference between the two series lies in the allowance given by the Paideia series to the commentators to do their own translation of the greek text (as highlighted by Mikeal), instead of following a prescribed translation, as in the NIVAC series.
wow, thanks Mikeal,
now may I have an autographed copy?...
Post a Comment